<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Dave Champion Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives</link>
	<description>The Truth...like it or not!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion TV Show &#8211; October 20, 2012 Unalienable Rights by Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1910&#038;cpage=1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1910#comment-470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to say that after watching this &quot;training video&quot; on property I now know how to argue that property is part of the declaration of Independence. 

This info is very timely because just this week I made the final connection between the New York Real Property Tax Law definition of &quot;real property&quot; and my &quot;personal property&quot; in my home and abode. Basically, there is no connection between my personal property home and abode and the commercially described &quot;real property&quot; contemplated by the definition. And, personal property is specifically excluded from consideration of taxation under the  Real Property Tax Law definition of &quot;real property&quot;. 

Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to say that after watching this &#8220;training video&#8221; on property I now know how to argue that property is part of the declaration of Independence. </p>
<p>This info is very timely because just this week I made the final connection between the New York Real Property Tax Law definition of &#8220;real property&#8221; and my &#8220;personal property&#8221; in my home and abode. Basically, there is no connection between my personal property home and abode and the commercially described &#8220;real property&#8221; contemplated by the definition. And, personal property is specifically excluded from consideration of taxation under the  Real Property Tax Law definition of &#8220;real property&#8221;. </p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – July 22, 2012 by tittiger</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1895&#038;cpage=1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>tittiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 03:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1895#comment-407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patiently waiting to hear something about Constitution II. It looks like the old one is on it&#039;s last legs.

Joe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patiently waiting to hear something about Constitution II. It looks like the old one is on it&#8217;s last legs.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – May 7, 2012 by tittiger</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1893&#038;cpage=1#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>tittiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1893#comment-403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are sorely missed buddy. Hope to see you back someday. Let us hear about Constitution 2 it&#039;s needed the old one did not work as as Spooner said:

&quot;But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.&quot;

Best
Joe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are sorely missed buddy. Hope to see you back someday. Let us hear about Constitution 2 it&#8217;s needed the old one did not work as as Spooner said:</p>
<p>&#8220;But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Best<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – May 4, 2012 by tittiger</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1891&#038;cpage=1#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>tittiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1891#comment-394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes that is exactly what I thought ... welcome back and Godspeed in your endeavors.

Joe in Missouri]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that is exactly what I thought &#8230; welcome back and Godspeed in your endeavors.</p>
<p>Joe in Missouri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – March 11, 2012 by tittiger</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1885&#038;cpage=1#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>tittiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1885#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miss hearing you on a regular basis Dave. Looking forward to constitution 2.

Blessings
Joe in Missouri]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss hearing you on a regular basis Dave. Looking forward to constitution 2.</p>
<p>Blessings<br />
Joe in Missouri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – January 17, 2012 by shorawitz</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1876&#038;cpage=1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>shorawitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1876#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We missed you Dave!  Glad you are still out there doing what you do!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We missed you Dave!  Glad you are still out there doing what you do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – February 1, 2012 by redthumb</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1879&#038;cpage=1#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>redthumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1879#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cause and the cure for all tyranny&#039;s and oppressions are rooted in beliefs.--redthumb

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”--William Pitt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cause and the cure for all tyranny&#8217;s and oppressions are rooted in beliefs.&#8211;redthumb</p>
<p>“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”&#8211;William Pitt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – January 17, 2012 by tittiger</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1876&#038;cpage=1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>tittiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1876#comment-260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where the hell have you been hiding brother? Glad to see that you were not NDAA&#039;ed!

Joe in Missouri]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the hell have you been hiding brother? Glad to see that you were not NDAA&#8217;ed!</p>
<p>Joe in Missouri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – December 13, 2011 by tittiger</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1874&#038;cpage=1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>tittiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1874#comment-253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Were you NDAA&#039;d Dave?
Starting to worry about you but I don&#039;t know anyone that might know how to contact you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you NDAA&#8217;d Dave?<br />
Starting to worry about you but I don&#8217;t know anyone that might know how to contact you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dave Champion Show – September 26, 2011 by shorawitz</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1843&#038;cpage=1#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>shorawitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=1843#comment-188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave,

Was listening to the show this morning and the section on the 9th Circuit Court and EPA got me thinking. I wonder if it&#039;s possible in Constitution of the U.S.A. II to make divisions of government goal based for compensation?  I&#039;m thinking that if you keep departments competing against others for bonus $$ like the private sector does for performance, then maybe we&#039;d all see better service/actions from our Government?!?!  In this case, the court as a whole could get bonus&#039;d based on their actions of keeping other departments in check.  The bonus would come from a pool of funds available to all departments who do the extras spelled out in the Constitution II (like go after other piss-poor departments to which they have jurisdiction.)  Only the public could add/remove watch-dog directives through the defined process of amendment.  Just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Was listening to the show this morning and the section on the 9th Circuit Court and EPA got me thinking. I wonder if it&#8217;s possible in Constitution of the U.S.A. II to make divisions of government goal based for compensation?  I&#8217;m thinking that if you keep departments competing against others for bonus $$ like the private sector does for performance, then maybe we&#8217;d all see better service/actions from our Government?!?!  In this case, the court as a whole could get bonus&#8217;d based on their actions of keeping other departments in check.  The bonus would come from a pool of funds available to all departments who do the extras spelled out in the Constitution II (like go after other piss-poor departments to which they have jurisdiction.)  Only the public could add/remove watch-dog directives through the defined process of amendment.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
