<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Champion Show – March 19, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?feed=rss2&#038;p=760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=760</link>
	<description>The Truth...like it or not!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: i18rabbit</title>
		<link>http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=760&#038;cpage=1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>i18rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?p=760#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[one issue that seems to constantly be left out of discussions regarding corporations is there current status in relation to the public.  my understanding is that people created govt, and govt created corporations; in large part due to liability concerns that arose out of large numbers of people being involed in the manufacture of a product, and the inherent inability to hold any one person lawfully responsible for any damages associated with the product.  but back to the point: corporations originally were only chartered to serve the public in for a specific purpose, and for a specific length of time.  so - my question is: why does everyone talk about corporations as if they are private entities that have any rights whatsoever - especially in regards to the deprivation of the rights of people?

i think it is more proper for corporations to be servants of the people, created only out of a strict and well-defined necessity, for a specific purpose, and they should only have the &quot;rights&quot; (privileges) needed to serve their function.  they should not have more political or other powers greater than any man.
it&#039;s unbelievable to me that a public corporation has the power to deny a man of his rights.  since when is the property of a public corporation private property?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one issue that seems to constantly be left out of discussions regarding corporations is there current status in relation to the public.  my understanding is that people created govt, and govt created corporations; in large part due to liability concerns that arose out of large numbers of people being involed in the manufacture of a product, and the inherent inability to hold any one person lawfully responsible for any damages associated with the product.  but back to the point: corporations originally were only chartered to serve the public in for a specific purpose, and for a specific length of time.  so &#8211; my question is: why does everyone talk about corporations as if they are private entities that have any rights whatsoever &#8211; especially in regards to the deprivation of the rights of people?</p>
<p>i think it is more proper for corporations to be servants of the people, created only out of a strict and well-defined necessity, for a specific purpose, and they should only have the &#8220;rights&#8221; (privileges) needed to serve their function.  they should not have more political or other powers greater than any man.<br />
it&#8217;s unbelievable to me that a public corporation has the power to deny a man of his rights.  since when is the property of a public corporation private property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
